Doctors draw up policy on female circumcision

News  Toronto Star. Monday, 6 January 1992.

Sherri Davis-Barron
SouthamStar Network

After months of investigation, the licencing body for Ontario doctors has drafted a policy concerning female circumcision. The policy, which has not yet been ratified, is likely to say Ontario doctors should not perform the operation.

I haven't seen anything that would lead me to infer that this is a practice that should be done in Ontario, says Roy Beckett, Associate Registrar for the College of Physicians and Surgeons of Ontario. Most people would consider this to be a mutilation type of procedure.

Beckett drafted the one-page policy statement after spending six months investigating the issue for the college, which represents 25,000 doctors.

The practice, which involves the removal of a young girl's genitalia, occurs mostly in central Africa. The issue arose in Canada in June when the Ottawa Citizen reported that Ottawa doctors were being asked by African parents to perform the surgery on their children.

I have been getting about two to three calls a month from doctors, organizations, and members of the public since the summer, Beckett said in an interview.

Doctors wanted to know if we had a policy on this. We saw a perceived need to develop a statement.

Beckett declined to say exactly what the policy says. Although it's been approved by the college's executive committee, it hasn't been ratified by the 27-member governing council. The policy is to come before the council Jan. 27.

Beckett says he can't predict how the council will respond.

The practice can involve cutting off the young girl's external genital parts, including the clitoris. In some countries, it includes stitching closed the vulva until marriage, leaving a small opening for urination and menstrual flow.

It occurs in parts of at least 25 African countries, and in parts of Asia and the Middle East. The World Health Organization, which has been working to eradicate the practice for at least a decade, says it affects at least 80 million women.

Various health risks have been linked to it, including immediate serious bleeding, recurring infections, pain during intercourse, hemorrhaging during childbirth and infertility.

There is no evidence the surgery has been performed in Canada. However, Charles Kyazze, head of Ottawa's African Resource Centre, believes it is being performed here by members of the community. In some cases, families are sending their children to Africa to have it done.

Kyazze welcomed the college's proposed policy because he says it might spur the federal government to pass legislation specifically banning female circumcision.

If doctors come out with a policy I don't think politicians can refuse to pass legislation because it's the doctors who are closely linked to this issue.

But, Richard Mosley, senior general counsel in criminal and family law policy for the federal Justice Department said the criminal code already would apply to the cases of female circumcision in Canada.

A child cannot consent to be mutilated and a parent cannot provide consent for a child to be mutilated, he said. It would be seen by the Canadian courts as assault causing bodily harm or an aggravated assault involving the wounding, maiming or disfiguring of the child.

Asked whether there have been discussions about creation of a specific law banning female circumcision, Mosley said he could not comment.

Britain has a law banning the practice.

Citation:

The Circumcision Information and Resource Pages are a not-for-profit educational resource and library. IntactiWiki hosts this website but is not responsible for the content of this site. CIRP makes documents available without charge, for informational purposes only. The contents of this site are not intended to replace the professional medical or legal advice of a licensed practitioner.

Top  © CIRP.org 1996-2024 | Filetree | Please visit our sponsor and host: External link IntactiWiki.