[Meritcare] Hospital wants out of lawsuit over circumcision

News  Forum (Fargo). Thursday, 19 December 2002.

Steven P. Wagner

Lawyers for Fargo's  External link MeritCare Hospital want their client dropped from a circumcision trial before it heads to court.

Wednesday, attorney  External link Jane Voglewede asked East Central District Judge  External link Cynthia Rothe-Seeger to order the change.

The move, if ordered, would leave  External link Dr. Sunita Kantak of MeritCare the sole defendant in the case.

 External link Anita Flatt of Hawley, Minn., is suing the doctor and hospital, claiming she and her husband, James, weren't told complete and accurate details about removing the foreskin from their son's penis.

Anita Flatt signed a consent form for circumcision, but hospital staff didn't describe the benefits or risks of the procedure, the lawsuit says.

The procedure provides no medical benefit, argues their attorney,  External link Zenas Baer. Rothe-Seeger set several deadlines for lawyers to submit written requests and share information.

Once lawyers submit their motions, Rothe-Seeger will oversee a final motion hearing before ruling on several legal issues.

Jury selection begins Feb. 3 in what Baer says is the nation's first trial of its kind. Baer calls circumcision a barbaric practice and claims the hospital's doctors should have provided more information before the Flatts consented to the procedure.

Kantak circumcised their son, now 5, one day after he was born.

If the couple had known more about the procedure, they would have chosen not to do it, Baer said.

The hospital contends Anita Flatt was given information about circumcision and gave doctors her consent to perform the procedure.

This information educates parents about circumcision and allows them to make an informed choice that factors in their own personal beliefs and preferences, hospital spokeswoman Carrie Johnson said earlier this week.

In court Wednesday, Voglewede said the hospital wasn't served with the lawsuit.

She denied comment after the hearing, avoiding questions about her request to drop the hospital from the suit.

However, Baer said he opposes dropping the hospital from the lawsuit.

MeritCare was served with the suit, he said.

In another twist, Rothe-Seeger said she may divide issues in the case to separate liability and damage claims.

The judge also told Baer to submit questions he'd ask potential jurors if they were questioned individually and offer alternative ways to learn about their beliefs and family history.

Readers can reach Forum reporter Steven P. Wagner at (701) 241-5542


Back to News 2002 Back to the News 2002 page.

The Circumcision Information and Resource Pages are a not-for-profit educational resource and library. IntactiWiki hosts this website but is not responsible for the content of this site. CIRP makes documents available without charge, for informational purposes only. The contents of this site are not intended to replace the professional medical or legal advice of a licensed practitioner.

Top  © CIRP.org 1996-2024 | Filetree | Please visit our sponsor and host:  External link IntactiWiki.