New York Times (New York), Page A3. Thursday, 8 August 1996.
MINYA EL QAMH, Egypt – In the weeks since the Egyptian health minister banned the ritual genital mutilation of girls, no one in this Nile Delta farming town has consulted the senior local cleric on whether to proceed with the custom. Peopleplan to do it anyway.
The cleric, Sheik Taha Gad, expects most Egyptians to defy the ministerial decree. The importance that families put on trying to curb a woman's sexual appetite is so deeply ingrained that everyone from the local farmers appalled by the ruling to the top government official responsible for putting it into effect says that some social customs are too potent to be extinguished by law.
Islam says circumcision for men is a tradition of the Prophet,
the Sheik said. Men are obligated to do it to emulate him, and for women it is a virtue. But it is not really an issue that is discussed in public. Remember that Egyptian society clings tightly to its traditions and principles, so there is no change under way, and if one ever materializes no one will talk about it.
The expected defiance underscores the difficulty that any government -- even an autocratic one extremely sensitive to its international image -- faces in trying to alter social practices widely denounced abroad when they are embedded at home.
The tradition seems to be more of an African puberty rite than an Islamic one. It is frequently practiced in Egypt and the Sudan as well as sub-Saharan Africa, among Christians as well as Muslims, but is virtually unknown in most Arab countries.
Despite the general taboo against discussing the custom, the debate has been heard periodically in public for almost two years now, pressed by new women's groups and human rights organizations.
They point to the trauma involved for young girls and try to debunk the idea that a woman's sexual temptations, and by extension her family's honor, can be safeguarded only through a clitoridectomy, or removal of the clitoris and sometimes of surrounding labial tissue.
The procedure eliminates or severely reduces a woman's genital sexual sensation. Clitoridectomy is less drastic than infibulation, which involves removing all of a woman's external genitalia and sewing the wound shut until she is married, leaving a small hole for urination. These procedures are often referred to as female circumcision.
The recent ban in Egypt stemmed from a combination of factors. The new health minister, Ismail Sallem, and the new head of Al Azhar, the country's leading Islamic institution, both refused to endorse the custom.
In addition, there has been prominent coverage this summer of a few little girls who reportedly bled to death – including a Cairo girl passing through this town.
In Egypt the procedure is performed by midwives or barbers under the supervision of the adult women in the family, usually without anesthesia andoften under less than hygienic conditions.
The big problem, what makes us really apprehensive, is that most of this is done behind closed doors at home,
said Dr. Mushira al-Shafie, the deputy health minister.
Many have compared the current campaign to the battle to introduce birth control here.
Birth control was widely assailed as a sin when a drive to educate the public and provide contraceptives began in 1980. That campaign took about four years to have an effect.
When we started the birth control campaign, everyone was against us,
Shafie said, recalling the outcry over a poster that included a drawing of a woman's uterus. People were asking us why we wanted to limit the number of children when God takes care of everybody.
A coming health education and public relations campaign on clitoridectomy will emphasize that the practice can scar children psychologically and lead to future problems in sexual relations, menstruation and labor. The moral and religious message, Shafie said, must be left up to Al Azhar's scholars.
At this point, the religious scholars are not all convinced. The last leader of Al Azhar had issued a religious decree proclaiming that Islam endorsed the practice of clitoridectomy.
In response to the decree by that leader, Sheik Gad al-Haq Ali Gad al-Haq, who died in March, the Health Ministry declared last year that clitoridectomies must be performed only in hospitals, to make the procedure saferfor the girls, who are usually between the ages of 4 and 10.
Opponents of the procedure were shocked, feeling that the decision to confine the procedure to hospitals gave the practice a government seal of approval. The Egyptian Organization for Human Rights brought suit against Al Azhar to have the religious fiat reversed.
While the suit has been meandering through the courts, the new head of Al Azhar, Sheik Mohammed Tantawi, expressed reservations about the practice. He said the Koran did not mention the topic and references in the sayings of the Prophet Mohammed, the source of much Islamic law, were too vague to constitute a ruling.
The decision should be left up to the medical establishment, he said. The Health Ministry stepped in with its ban, superseding its 1995 action.
An estimated 100 million women today have undergone some form of traditional genital mutilation, and each year about 2 million more girls undergo the procedure. Although more than 20 countries in Africa have published policies opposing the procedures, they are rarely prohibited by law.
Nawal Saadawy, the Egyptian feminist whose book The Hidden Face of Eve
described her own experience with genital mutilation, estimates that in the United States, where she now teaches, about 40,000 of the procedures are performed each year in immigrant communities. Several states have laws against the practice, and the federal government has pursued the issue as well. Britain and France have made the procedures illegal.
No one is quite sure how the tradition got started.
Marie Assaad, the coordinator of the National Female Genital Mutilation Task Force in Egypt, wrote in a groundbreaking study that the tradition might have come from the Pharaohs. They apparently believed that gods were bisexual but that humans needed to have those tendencies excised through circumcision for men and clitoridectomy for women.
To this day, villagers around places like Minya el Qamh, 30 miles northeast of Cairo, believe that a woman will pursue sex as aggressively as a man ifshe has not undergone a clitoridectomy.
Am I supposed to stand around while my daughter chases men?
said Said Ibrahim, 53, a farmer aghast over the government ban. So what if some infidel doctor says it is unhealthy? Does that make it true? I would have circumcised my daughter even if they passed a death sentence against it.
Ibrahim said villagers would not obey the ruling unless they were persuaded to by a religious leader. You know what honor is in Egypt,
he said. If a woman is more passive it is in her interest, it is in her father's interest and in her husband's interest.
The conviction crosses generational lines. Mohammed Ali, 17, said he would not associate with a woman who had not undergone the procedure. Banning it would make women wild like those in America,
he said.
Shafie, the deputy health minister, says women feel that their reputations are at stake and therefore do not object to the practice.
Estimates on the number of girls who have undergone the procedure in Egypt range from 80 to 97 percent. It is believed to be ubiquitous in smaller villages, but the highest numbers are discounted because women might profess to having undergone the ritual, since it is considered such a hallmark of female modesty.
Belief in the practice is not limited to rural areas. Dr. Said M. Thabit, a Cairo obstetrician, said he had not heard about the government ban but believed that it would be catastrophic on moral and hygienic grounds.
With circumcision we remove the external parts, so when a girl wears tight nylon underclothes she will not have any stimulation,
said Thabit, who thinks the operation should be performed only by doctors and who keeps a collection of pictures of procedures botched by village barbers.
Dr. Gamal Gaith, who works at the Minya el Qamh Public Hospital, said the decree finally prompted him to turn families away. I used to do it,
he said, even though I knew it was harmful for the women, because of the money.
The Circumcision Information and Resource Pages are a not-for-profit educational resource and library. IntactiWiki hosts this website but is not responsible for the content of this site. CIRP makes documents available without charge, for informational purposes only. The contents of this site are not intended to replace the professional medical or legal advice of a licensed practitioner.
© CIRP.org 1996-2024 | Filetree | Please visit our sponsor and host: IntactiWiki.