Circumcision Information Network, Volume 2, Issue 11. Monday, 27 March 1995.
Introduction
This weekly bulletin is a project of CIN, the Circumcision Information Network (formerly CIN CompuBulletin). The purpose of this weekly bulletin is to educate the public about and to protect children and other non-consenting persons from genital mutilation. Readers are encouraged to copy and redistribute it, and to contribute written material.
--Rich Angell, Editor.
AN INTERVIEW WITH THE NURSES OF ST. VINCENT The New Times, February, 1995, Seattle, Washington, by Cat Saunders [Second of a multi-part series. The first part was Saunders' own view of circumcision as a human rights issue.] A group of nurses from St. Vincent' s Hospital in Santa Fe, New Mexico...have organized to stop circumcision. In this interview, I spoke with four of the nurses who were in Seattle recently. As you read their stories, open your heart. Let your feelings come, for only if we all feel the horror of circumcision can we stop it. Together we can stop it now. Cat: How did your conscientious objection begin? Mary: We came into this very simply. We just wanted people to stop hurting babies. In 1992, we started a petition. Before that, I think that we all had the sense that something was wrong, but we had never communicated about it. Everything I'd read said circumcision isn't a necessary thing to do, from a medical or health standpoint. So why are we doing it? You take a newborn baby, strap him down to a board, and cut on him. It's obviously painful! Circumcision became so intolerable that five of us wrote a letter saying that ethically we could no longer assist. When we were getting ready to present the letter, other nurses came out of the woodwork and asked to sign it. Out of about 50 nurses, 24 signed it. Betty: For years before that, we dealt with it the way women deal with things when they feel powerless. When it came time to do one, we would just make ourselves scarce. When I did have to assist, I would not look at the circumcision. I would look at the baby's face, and maybe put my finger in his mouth to pacify him. But whatever name you call it--mutilation, torture, creating a wound, violation it was going on, and I was never looking. It was crazy! Now we're conscientious objectors, but it's still going on. We can still hear it. Mary: Yes. Behind closed doors, you can hear the baby screaming. You know exactly what part of the operation is happening by how the screams are. Betty: Yes, that's important. Please quote that. Cat: How about the maiming that happens? One of my friends who is not circumcised said that in gym class, he noticed boys who have been maimed by it. Mary: Most people don't see that. They say, "What complications? What problems?" Cat: Mary-Rose, the video you all did, Saying No to Circumcision, begins with you telling a story about a recurring dream. Mary-Rose: Sometimes I think we get messages from the spiritual realm that we try to turn away, but the messages keep coming, and we have to listen. My dreams were about taking the babies and strapping them down, participating in the whole thing, and having the babies say to me. "Why are you doing this? You were just welcoming me, and now you're torturing me. Why, why, why?" I've watched doctors taking more foreskin than they should. When there's too much bleeding, they burn the wound with silver nitrate so that the penis looks like it's been burned with a cigarette. Then the doctor will tell us to go tell the mother that this is what it's supposed to look like. I know people are going to say it's weird, but I think circumcision is like the Holocaust; it's like rape--like any injustice--and this kind of abuse is still going on! Cat: It is abuse. Mary, you said in the video that doctors have told you not to say "poor baby" or comfort the baby after his circumcision, in front of the parents. This brings up the whole issue of responsibility and guilt, and how we protect the abusers instead of caring for the victims. Mary: Betty is actually in trouble for reacting to a circumcision. She opened a diaper, and her facial expression was such that the parents wrote a letter saying that she had "made them" feel guilty. Betty: Yes. They're saying my facial expression was "unprofessional." I was looking at a genital wound! I thought I was doing well, because I didn't cry. My thought was that maybe it was a botched circumcision, and that maybe too much had been cut off. But who am I to say, because now I think that any amount is too much. That's the position we're in now, where we are accused of harassing. Mary: Just by our mere existence, we "make" people feel guilty. People don't take responsibility for their guilt. There's so much denial about this. Mary-Rose: Sometimes I'll see a father with his son right after birth, and the bonding is really great. The baby is looking at the father, and the father is ecstatic he's communicating with his baby. Yet, he has his son circumcised. Afterward, the baby won't look at the father, and the father wants to know. "Why won't my baby look at me?" [To be continued.] AAP ACTION On Sunday, April 9th, NOHARMM New York in conjunction with NOHARMM Philadelphia will stage an action at the annual convention of the American Academy of Pediatrics. We will protest the AAP's reliance on research that it concedes is "flawed and inconclusive" to support circumcision. For more information, call 212-340-8015, or E-mail BarryBe@AOL.com, or attend the orientation meeting in NYC on Wednesday, April 5th, 19:00 local time, at 131 West 72nd St., 2nd Floor.
Back to the CIN Overview page.
The Circumcision Information and Resource Pages are a not-for-profit educational resource and library. IntactiWiki hosts this website but is not responsible for the content of this site. CIRP makes documents available without charge, for informational purposes only. The contents of this site are not intended to replace the professional medical or legal advice of a licensed practitioner.
© CIRP.org 1996-2024 | Filetree | Please visit our sponsor and host: IntactiWiki.