Pediatrics, Volume 80, Issue 5, Page 765. November 1987.
159 E Aleho, Palm Springs, CA 92262
Pediatrics, Volume 80, Issue 5, Page 765. November 1987.
159 E Aleho, Palm Springs, CA 92262
To the Editor
The controversy regarding circumcision and urinary tract infections following the article by Drs. Wiswell and Roscelli has not addressed one important factor—what kind of care is appropriate for an intact boy. After 40 years of pediatric practice, I am firmly convinced that the best hygiene is to keep hands off and leave the prepuce alone. I have had many infants with problems from inadequate and poorly done circumcisions; similarly, I have had many uncircumcised infants who got into trouble when a helpful
nurse, doctor, or grandmother forcibly retracted and cleaned a tight prepuce. In an area where many infants are uncircumcised because of culture, I have never seen a problem when the mother just left it the way the Lord made it—no retractions, no vigorous cleansing, just left it alone. Admittedly, I may have missed some of the urinary infections they described. However, in comparing the circumcised with the uncircumcised, we need to know what kind of care or hygiene was given to the prepuce. Historically, many scientific interventions
have proven to be more injurious than helpful. Perhaps vigorous cleaning of the prepuce and glans penis are in that category.
159 E Aleho, Palm Springs, CA 92262
The Circumcision Information and Resource Pages are a not-for-profit educational resource and library. IntactiWiki hosts this website but is not responsible for the content of this site. CIRP makes documents available without charge, for informational purposes only. The contents of this site are not intended to replace the professional medical or legal advice of a licensed practitioner.
© CIRP.org 1996-2024 | Filetree | Please visit our sponsor and host: 
IntactiWiki.