Male ritual circumcision resulting in acute renal failure

Journal  British Medical Journal, Volume 309, Issue 6955, Pages 660-661. Saturday, 10 September 1994.

Julian D. Eason, Maria McDonnell, Godfrey Clark

Male ritual circumcision is commonplace in the British community, especially among those of Jewish and Muslim faiths and certain immigrant populations such as West Africans. We report three cases of circumcision performed in the community in which the parents were not warned about complications and which resulted in prolonged urinary retention and acute renal failure.

Case reports

CASE 1

A 15 day old baby was admitted with a four day history of increasing vomiting and abdominal distension. After a normal pregnancy and birth he had been admitted to this hospital's special care baby unit for one day because of tachypnoea, grunting, and poor feeding. He had been circumcised by a local community rabbi at 11 days of age. Increasing vomiting and abdominal distension were subsequently noted, but he continued to feed well. His mother thought thathe was passing urine normally.

On physical examination he had a pulse rate of 140 beats/min, warm hands and feet, a blood pressure of 77/52 mm Hg, and a respiratory rate of 28 per minute. The bladder was palpable above the umbilicus, but the abdomen wall was soft with normal bowel sounds. His penis was tightly bandaged, and the circumcision wound was inflammed and purulent. Table I shows the results of his initial renal function tests.

After removal of the penile dressing the bladder was catheterised through the urethra and chloramphenicol ointment applied to the wound. A wound swab contained mixed Gram negative organisms on culture. Intravenous cefotaxime was also prescribed. Urine output was replaced hourly with 0.9% intravenous saline as his initial diuresis after relief of the urinary obstruction was large (1129 ml).

The following day he became irritable with repetitive myoclonic jerking in his arms and legs. Anticonvulsants were given for three days, but no cause for the abnormal movements was found. Plasma electrolyte concentrations had returned to normal by that time (table II), but he was still polyuric (10 ml/kg/h). The jerking did not recur. The catheter was removed two days later, after which he voided a good urinary stream. At review one month later the wound had healed and he was thriving.

CASE 2

A male baby of Nigerian parents was born at this hospital at term after a normal pregnancy. At the age of 1 month he was circumcised by a non-medical community practitioner at home. Two days later he began screaming and stopped feeding, be came jittery, and his parents noticed that his abdomen was distended; when seen in the accident and emergency department he had not passed urine for at least 16 hours. On physical examination his pulse rate was 180 beats/min, with a respiratory rate of 60-80 per minute; his abdomen was distended by the bladder, which was palpable above the umbilicus. His penis was swollen, and the tight penile dressing was covered with faeces. Initial investigations showed mild hyponatraemia and renal failure (table I); his urine was infected with Escherichia coli and Streptococcus faecalis. He was prescribed cefotaxime and flucloxacillin intravenously. He received an extra 3 mmol/kg/day sodium chloride in his maintenance fluids (0.18% saline, 4% glucose). His plasma biochemistry and renal fuction tests improved rapidly (table II), and renal ultrasonography, micturating cystography, and renal scanning with radiolabelled dimercaptosuccinic acid subsequently gave normal results.

   [TABULAR DATA OMITTED]

   TABLE II--Plasma electrolyte concentrations and renal function
   in the three baby boys 24 hours after admission


           Sodium     Potassium     Urea      Creatinine

Case No    (mmol/l)   (mmol/l)    (mmol/l)    (mmol/l)
  1          135         3.1        3.0          31
  2          139         5.5        5.5          39
  3          143         3.9       <0.7          12

CASE 3

A Nigerian baby, who was a second twin, was born at 32 weeks' gestation by ventouse extraction after premature rupture of the membranes. He was cared for in the special care baby unit for 19 days. A urinary tract infection caused by S faecalis was diagnosed when he was 5 days old and was successfully treated; his renal function was normal.

At 6 weeks of age (corrected gestational age 39 weeks) he was circumcised by a community practitioner. Forty eight hours later he was admitted to this paediatric department with a history of postoperative irritability. His breathing had become distressed, he had had two episodes of apnoea with cyanosis and limpness. Some jerking of his left leg had occurred during the second episode. On physical examination his pulse rate was 130 beats/min, respiratory rate 70-80 per minute, and blood pressure 80/50 mm Hg. He had cold fingers and toes with bilateral leg oedema. His abdomen was grossly distended by the bladder which was palpable up to the umbilicus. The penile dressing was tight and the penile meatus blocked by paraffin gauze dressing placed over the glans, which looked infected. Table I shows his plasma electrolyte concentrations and renal function test results. He alsohad a moderate metabolic acidosis.

The dressing was removed and the bladder catheterised through the urethra. Intravenous cefotaxime and flucloxacillin were started. A urine specimen grew streptococci. His urine was replaced hourly with 0.9% saline. His general condition, plasma electrolyte concentrations, metabolic acidosis, and renal function improved within 24 hours (table II). Two weeks later his would had healed and renal scanning with radiolabelled dimercaptosuccinic acid showed noscarring.

Discussion

These three babies were admitted to Guy's Hospital over a period of two years with symptoms of dyspnoea, vomiting, and abdominal distension following circumcision. All were local children; in all cases the anuria had gone unnoticed (the parents of the baby in case 2 realised that their son had not passed urine only after direct questioning).

Male ritual circumcision is widely practised in the community and is generally regarded as safe. Indeed, it is the most widely practised surgical procedure in the world.1 One sixth of the male population has had a ritual circumcision, usually in infancy (among Jews) and in early childhood (among Muslims). Circumcision otherwise is uncommon in Europe and Scandinavia. Its merits have been periodically debated in the United Kingdom and the United States.1,2

Medical indications for circumcision are recurrent balanitis, phimosis, paraphimosis, and a redundant prepuce.  [CIRP logo Note: sic -- there is no such thing as a redundant prepuce.]  Common problems encountered with the procedure are bleeding, removal of too much skin, removal of too much or too little mucosa, untidy tags, previous circumcision in boys with hypospadias, fistula of the urethra, meatal stenosis, accidental amputation, and urinary retention.1,2,3,4,5 An excellent review of these and other less common postoperative complications has recently been published.3

Little is ever mentioned about prolonged urinary obstruction due to overzealous bandaging or penile oedema. Our experience clearly shows that unless parents are given appropriate information about possible complications, such as anuria associated with urinary retention, the consequences could be fatal. Our patients developed considerable hyperkalaemia, hyponatraemia, and acute renal failure. Appropriate education of parents and community practitioners is clearly needed and would greatly reduce the risks.

References

  1. Nixon H, O'Donnell B. In: Essentials of paediatric surgery. 4th ed. Oxford: Butterworth-Heinemann, 1992:82-8.
  2. Holder T, Ashcraft KW. In: Pediatric surgery. 2nd ed. Philadelphia: W B Saunders, 1993:715-20.
  3. Willams N, Kapila L. Complications of circumcision. Br J Surg 1993;80: 1231-6.
  4. Welch KJ, Randolph JG, Ravitch MM, O'Neil JA, Rowe MI. In: Pediatric surgery. 4th ed. Vol 2. Chicago: Yearbook Medical Publishers, 1979:1314-6.
  5. Nixon HH. Surgical conditions in paediatrics. London: Butterworth, 1978:346-7.

(Accepted 3 March 1994)

Citation:

The Circumcision Information and Resource Pages are a not-for-profit educational resource and library. IntactiWiki hosts this website but is not responsible for the content of this site. CIRP makes documents available without charge, for informational purposes only. The contents of this site are not intended to replace the professional medical or legal advice of a licensed practitioner.

Top  © CIRP.org 1996-2024 | Filetree | Please visit our sponsor and host: External link IntactiWiki.