narrow,say children's advocates
(Released 22:00 UCT, March 1, 1999)
The American Academy of Pediatrics today released its long-awaited Policy Statement on male circumcision, a procedure that removes erogenous skin from a child's penis.
The statement finally concluded that the potential medical benefits
of newborn male circumcision are not sufficient to recommend routine infant circumcision. This should mean more boys will be allowed to grow up intact and healthy.
Other recommendations were that some pain relief be provided. Most circumcisions in the U.S. are still executed without any form of analgesia.
The Policy Statement arose out of a two-year investigation conducted by the AAP's Task Force on Neonatal Circumcision. It had been hoped that the Task Force would address urgent issues such as penile anatomy and sexual function, protecting boys from forcible foreskin retraction, and the human rights of the child. Instead, the statement is a narrow legalistic policy with no real guidance in these areas.
Male circumcision remains a common procedure in the U.S. It has been receiving increased attention in recent months, largely from men who say infant circumcision violated their basic rights.
The AAP's news release Analysis by NOHARMM (link to NOHARMM website)The AAP held its Spring Session April 17-20, 1999 at the Hyatt Regency in Chicago. Carole Lannon presented the Policy Statement at this meeting.
The Circumcision Information and Resource Pages are a not-for-profit educational resource and library. IntactiWiki hosts this website but is not responsible for the content of this site. CIRP makes documents available without charge, for informational purposes only. The contents of this site are not intended to replace the professional medical or legal advice of a licensed practitioner.
© CIRP.org 1996-2024 | Filetree | Please visit our sponsor and host: IntactiWiki.